- About
- Research
-
-
- Special Reports & Features
- From Risk to Resilience: Indigenous Alternatives to Climate Risk Assessment in Canada
- Twenty-Five Years of Gladue: Indigenous ‘Over-Incarceration’ & the Failure of the Criminal Justice System on the Grand River
- Calls to Action Accountability: A 2023 Status Update on Reconciliation
- Data Colonialism in Canada’s Chemical Valley
- Bad Forecast: The Illusion of Indigenous Inclusion and Representation in Climate Adaptation Plans in Canada
- Indigenous Food Sovereignty in Ontario: A Study of Exclusion at the Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs
- Indigenous Land-Based Education in Theory & Practice
- Between Membership & Belonging: Life Under Section 10 of the Indian Act
- Redwashing Extraction: Indigenous Relations at Canada’s Big Five Banks
- Treaty Interpretation in the Age of Restoule
- A Culture of Exploitation: “Reconciliation” and the Institutions of Canadian Art
- Bill C-92: An Act respecting First Nations, Inuit, and Métis Children, Youth and Families
- COVID-19, the Numbered Treaties & the Politics of Life
- The Rise of the First Nations Land Management Regime: A Critical Analysis
- The UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in Canada: Lessons from B.C.
- View all reports.
- Special Reports & Features
-
-
- Yellowhead School
- LIBRARY
- Contact
- Submissions
- Donate
SPECIAL REPORT
From Risk to Resilience:
Indigenous Alternatives to Climate Risk Assessment
in Canada
Canada’s current provincial and national risk assessment frameworks focus predominantly on the built environment and infrastructure, neglecting the more extensive social-ecological system.
This narrow focus fails to capture the full extent of climate risks or contexts, particularly those affecting Indigenous communities, and excludes the social and political structures that compound risk within Indigenous communities. While Canada is grappling with applying a standard risk assessment framework, Indigenous communities, nationally and globally, are deeply concerned that such limited understandings of “risk” could contribute to neglecting climate impacts within the larger ecosystems. These limited risk narratives could have genuine impacts on our climate resilience and our abilities to practice our culture holistically, but they also fail to account for the interactions and interdependencies that exist within the natural world. Since Indigenous communities are socially, economically, spiritually, and culturally dependent on continued reciprocal relationships with their territories, many Indigenous people are concerned about climate risks and that “future generations will not have the same opportunities and experiences out on the Land as they had growing up” (Cameron et al., 2021). The inclusion of Indigenous knowledges and a different way of looking at risk assessments is not just a suggestion but an urgent necessity to ensure a comprehensive understanding of climate risks that builds holistic resilience to climate risks and to climate change.
KEY QUESTIONS
How do colonial narratives and understandings of risk impact our collective climate resilience, cultural practices, and the recognition of natural interdependencies?
How can Indigenous approaches to land and water relationships offer a more effective understanding and response to climate change and its risks?
RELATED RESOURCES
Indigenous communities impacted by climate events in the last few years have been hit the hardest and continue to fall through risk assessment gaps because the risks they have faced have been largely institutional rather than natural.
- Janna Wale and Brett Huson
AUTHOR
Janna Wale
Gitxsan, Cree-Métis
AUTHOR & ARTIST
Brett D. Huson
Gitxsan