- About
- Research
-
-
- Special Reports & Features
- Calls to Action Accountability: A 2021 Status Update on Reconciliation
- Treaty Interpretation in the Age of Restoule
- A Culture of Exploitation: “Reconciliation” and the Institutions of Canadian Art
- Bill C-92: An Act respecting First Nations, Inuit, and Métis Children, Youth and Families
- COVID-19, the Numbered Treaties & the Politics of Life
- The Rise of the First Nations Land Management Regime: A Critical Analysis
- The UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in Canada: Lessons from B.C.
- View all reports.
- Special Reports & Features
-
-
- Education
- LIBRARY
- Contact
- Submissions
- Donate
What is the role of injunctions in legalizing the forced removal of Indigenous peoples resisting development or extraction on their lands? In this video, grassroots Indigenous leaders discuss the weaponization of injunctions against land defense.
The late Secwepemc leader, Arthur Manuel, called the injunction a “legal billy club” because it is a weapon used to criminalize Indigenous people and remove them from their lands through force. It is put to work when Indigenous peoples refuse to comply with decisions that deny their inherent rights. The beneficiaries are companies and governments who are able to protect their interests because of the way “harm” is recognized by the court. Disruption to economic activity has far out valued Indigenous livelihood and inherent rights